![Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor - ScienceDirect Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor - ScienceDirect](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2590161320300144-gr1.jpg)
Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor - ScienceDirect
![FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography - Ayres‐de‐Campos - 2015 - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics - Wiley Online Library FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography - Ayres‐de‐Campos - 2015 - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics - Wiley Online Library](https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/asset/9b22eff1-b095-4a8a-9a4e-18f2030ff8f0/ijgo13-fig-0009-m.jpg)
FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography - Ayres‐de‐Campos - 2015 - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics - Wiley Online Library
![PDF) Challenges and practical steps to optimizing the utilization of electronic fetal monitoring in low and medium income countries: The UBTH experience PDF) Challenges and practical steps to optimizing the utilization of electronic fetal monitoring in low and medium income countries: The UBTH experience](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338742268/figure/fig1/AS:850119599611906@1579695715507/CTG-classification-2015-revised-guidelines-on-intrapartum-fetal-monitoring_Q320.jpg)
PDF) Challenges and practical steps to optimizing the utilization of electronic fetal monitoring in low and medium income countries: The UBTH experience
![The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/table-2.jpg)
The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical
![Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/table-1.jpg)
Swedish study investigates discrepancies between CTG classification systems, and the impact on ST event significance. « Neoventa Medical
![Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. | Semantic Scholar Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/2c8ac9ecfb97fcad7ec09bcbeb6ed34e0548c686/2-Table1-1.png)
Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. | Semantic Scholar
![Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome](https://juniperpublishers.com/gjorm/images/GJORM.MS.ID.555737.G003.png)
Introduction of the Physiological CTG Interpretation & Hypoxia in Labour (HIL) Tool, and its Incorporation into a Software Programme: Impact on Perinatal Outcome
![The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical](http://www.neoventa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/table-3.jpg)
The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical
![Each Fetus Matters: An Urgent Paradigm Shift is needed to Move away from the Rigid “CTG Guideline Stickers” so as to Individualize Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring and to improve Perinatal Outcomes Each Fetus Matters: An Urgent Paradigm Shift is needed to Move away from the Rigid “CTG Guideline Stickers” so as to Individualize Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring and to improve Perinatal Outcomes](https://medcraveonline.com/OGIJ/images/OGIJ-05-00168-g001.png)